Explainer on The New Higher Education Funding Model.

Senators question Education PS regarding the university funding model.

Advertisements
Advertisements

Senators question Education PS regarding the university funding model.

MPS THE WEAKEST LINK IN THE UNIVERSITY FUNDING MODEL IMPASSE

Universities’ finances have improved since the controversial funding model was implemented. That is the statement from PS/Higher Education. Senators avoided the straightforward question, “At whose expense are universities enjoying financial stability? Answer: Parents -; the issue lies here. The State is shifting the burden of funding universities from students (HELB) to parents.

Advertisements

The senators’ inquiries confirmed concerns about State capture of Parliament. They supported the model but do not comprehend why it is ineffective. The PS responded bravely.

The model is based on incorrect assumptions. It applies school financing methods to university education. It is destined to fail for the following reasons:

Advertisements

1. Discrimination: All university students are young unemployed adults. It is discriminatory for the wealth status of parents to dictate State support levels. Degree holder MPs financed their own university education through HELB loans. It is unethical for them to establish a discriminatory model. Parents’ involvement should be limited to being tax payers. It creates a sense of responsibility among graduates who are debtors. The new funding model reduces Vice Chancellors to the status of school principals.

Advertisements

2. Stigmatization: Students from low-income families will face social stigma. They are easily identified and marginalized, facing challenges in connecting with peers and being relegated to lower ranks. It introduces a divide between dynasties and proletariats in the university education system.

3. Skewed choice of courses: Parents’ wealth status will overshadow passion in students’ selection of study courses. Students from low-income families will steer clear of expensive fields like Dentistry, Medicine, Engineering, and Law, among others.

Solution: MPs must create legislation to remove bias in financing university education by establishing it as a contract between students and the State.

THE NEW UNIVERSITY FUNDING MODEL BANDS EXPLAINED:
Band 1: For families with a monthly income up to Sh5,995
Band 2: For families with a monthly income up to Sh23,670
Band 3: For families with a monthly income up to Sh70,000
Band 4: For families with a monthly income up to Sh120,000
Band 5: For families with a monthly income above Sh120,000
FUNDING
BAND 1:
The government scholarship will cover 70%, the loan will cover 25%, making the total support 95%. The family will contribute 5%, and the upkeep loan will be Sh60,000.
BAND 2:
The government scholarship will cover 60%, the loan will cover 30%, making the total support 90%. The family will contribute 10%, and the upkeep loan will be Sh55,000.
BAND 3:
The government scholarship will cover 50%, the loan will cover 30%, making the total support 80%. The family will contribute 20%, and the upkeep loan will be Sh50,000.
BAND 4:
The government scholarship will cover 40%, the loan will cover 30%, making the total support 70%. The family will contribute 30%,
BAND 5:
The government scholarship will cover 30%, the loan will cover 30%, making the total support 60%. The family will contribute 40%, and the upkeep loan will be Sh40,000.